| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,243 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
AU58 for me
Edit: looking at this again, I can also see AU55
Edited by Ty2020b
02/26/2021 8:44 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Really pretty for a 17-S. I vote AU55-AU58.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
I don't see any gown lines going across the leg so I'd say Low AU at best.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
AU53 possible lightly cleaned
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6396 Posts |
Close to mint state and nice. Weak gown lines seem pretty standard for pre-1921 Walkers. I'd call it AU-58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2342 Posts |
Is that clashing on her right arm...and in that area there are also 3 scratch lines that give me cause for concern...?
EF-AU details?
smat
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Smat , I think your right about the clashing marks on obverse , but I didn't think that would affect grade .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7078 Posts |
AU-details
Reverse looks flat and lifeless
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18706 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10047 Posts |
Thanks for the ideas - right online with what I was thinking as well. Sorry. Camera on the fritz. ANACs says Details AU 50 REV Cleaned. Now my question: Would the cleaning have taken it down to AU50? It is very hard to find any hits to the surface and devices. Again, the pics show scratches on the slab. In fact, in hand it takes tilting it at the right angle to find the cleaning. Tilting it at just the right angle shows an area where the rim and lettering "ES OF AM" on the REV had something removed. That area looks like faint toning appear with a very, very light blueish tint - again - when tilted. Otherwise a full-on view shows normal luster. One of these days I will take the time to improve taking good pics! Quote:
Close to mint state and nice. Weak gown lines seem pretty standard for pre-1921 Walkers. I'd call it AU-58. Yes - too bad these all were not fully struck. Quote:
AU-details
Reverse looks flat and lifeless Totally my pictures doing it. Like I said above - in hand it just looks like normal, beautiful luster. How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7078 Posts |
Better pixs would help, however the luster can be seen on the obv between the rays and all around the T of Liberty, but nada on the rev. Great looking coin to have never the less..  |
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
A bit surprised ANACS went with a Details 50. Hard to tell about the cleaning and wonder why just on the reverse?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2342 Posts |
So when I click on the pic to enlarge it and zoom in on the obverse between the I and B of LIBERTY...those 3 scratches are on the holder and not the coin?
As far as the cleaning goes...must have to have it in hand to see it...I can't tell?
Nice coin!
smat
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,243 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/26/2021 8:39 pm
