| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 1,562 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1107 Posts |
Quote: I look at my sets, usually as circulation coins only, so I don't need proofs etc. I also don't need errors or varieties. I usually prefer to do business strikes only as well most of the time. That is how my Lincoln Cent set is. With my Jefferson set, I opted to do business strike coins only initially. However, sometime later, since I already had some proofs, I decided to complete the circle and add all the additional proofs. It's a very good set and I'm glad decided to do the proofs. I have all the proof nickels from 1956-2005, and I am in the process of obtaining all the modern ones from 2006 and newer, as well as whatever I can manage to purchase from 1950-1955. Though I do have some other proofs, I generally don't consider them personally a must.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
It is difficult to stop collecting proofs once you start. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1759 Posts |
 Sad, but so very true. I am now mainly into proof & specimen Canadian coins and mint sets. Can't escape!  PS: also this year, silver Canadian Maple Leaf bullion. (without Privy marks) I have the 1867-1967 Royal Canadian Mint set missing the $20.00 gold coin (for now), my example of a set without a key coin.
Edited by Sharks 12/10/2025 3:21 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote:I have the 1867-1967 Royal Canadian Mint set missing the $20.00 gold coin (for now), my example of a set without a key coin. For now. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2520 Posts |
My philosophy has changed since I was a 10 year old kid plugging holes in those Whitman folders in the 1970's. Back then I was focused on filling as many of those holes that I could afford...and through roll searching. Then life happened, wife, kids, unaffordability. Now older, I focus on bargains. Some people here know I spend most of my time on ebay and it pays out. About 10 years ago I bought a Whitman folder (only missing 1909SVDB) for $107.32. Kept the 1914D (good) and 1931S (fine) and swapped out 5 other AU for my lower grade and resold the folder for $200. (so essentially I was paid about $85 to take two key dates off this guys hands). Another deal about 5 years ago, a Seller sold a complete date/mm Indian Head cent folder, and a complete date/mm Buffalo nickel folder (no acid dates). I ended up paying $85.50 for both after he refunded some postage. (1877 Indian has a slight bend but the 1909S should straight grade). I guess what I'm getting to, is do the best that you can now, you never know what lies in the future. You may stumble into a deal that you weren't expecting and be able to fill some of those keys. Don't lose any sleep over a hole in your Dansco.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote: I guess what I'm getting to, is do the best that you can now, you never know what lies in the future. You may stumble into a deal that you weren't expecting and be able to fill some of those keys. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6448 Posts |
You could just buy recent Wheat cent proofs and flip them to show reverse in those holes. Then the hole is filled with a real Wheat cent, but it is obvious that it isn't the key date coin.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote:You could just buy recent Wheat cent proofs and flip them to show reverse in those holes. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94614 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
875 Posts |
I wouldn't not start a collection due to key dates. If you like the series then just collect what you can and enjoy them. I like Mercury dimes but just because the 16-D is out of my price range doesn't mean I can't enjoy the 95% of the other coins.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
It is out of your price range until it is not. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
216 Posts |
You modern collectors have it easy. There's medieval stuff I need for a set that won't show up on the market in my lifetime, regardless of how much money I have to spend.
I still have a Lincoln set missing that one key, and while I could save up for it, I've chosen to deploy the capital elsewhere. It doesn't detract from my set, which has many common, mid-grade pieces contributed from both sides of my family. Besides, I'd never fill the '55 DDO hole anyway, since it's only a variety.
I always wanted to pursue half dimes (I even bought a Dansco!), but that one key rarity wouldn't stop me.
Collecting is about more than filling someone else's holes. (Okay, that came out wrong. It's about more than filling perceived voids in a list based on what someone else considers worthy of a set.) How many Morgan collectors have all the varieties? How many consider "completion" to be whatever someone at Dansco or Whitman deemed worthy many decades ago? Don't let someone else tell you what a "set" or "complete" means. Set your own rules, your own standards -- then strive to achieve them!
Edited by samoth 12/11/2025 6:15 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7933 Posts |
My Poland OFER (One From Every Reign) would require paying a few thousand for a coin of Wladyslaw IV, as he only struck thalers, half thalers and gold, all relatively rare.
Not losing any sleep over it, and not regretting that I ever started that collection.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19107 Posts |
This has been an invigorating conversation!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote: You modern collectors have it easy. I will take that as a win!  You medieval and ancients guys have the patience of the saints. 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 24 / Views: 1,562 |
Page 2 of 2
|