Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1817 Fake Mexico 8 Reales

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 4,493Next Topic  
New Member
wdpayne's Avatar
United States
38 Posts
 Posted 09/27/2012  4:57 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add wdpayne to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I have a counterfeit 8 Reales coin from Mexico. Does anybody know anything about this? I don't think it is a modern fake since it is considerably worn. Here are the attributes of the coin:

Weight 24.6g - a little light but within reason for contemporary counterfeits

Silver Content: approx 25% (by specific gravity), 35% by X-ray (XRF).

Medal Alignment

The assayer initials are also wrong - T H instead of J J.

The date is in the wrong place as compared to genuine issues.

The workmanship is decent - may be an English fake?

Here is a picture of the obverse, reverse and edge. The actual coin is much less yellow than the pictures show.

1817-Fake-Mexico-8-Reales

1817-Fake-Mexico-8-Reales

1817-Fake-Mexico-8-Reales
Pillar of the Community
jfransch's Avatar
United States
1801 Posts
 Posted 09/27/2012  10:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jfransch to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What a great coin. My guess is a counterfeit meant to circulate back in the day. I love coins like this one.
New Member
wdpayne's Avatar
United States
38 Posts
 Posted 09/27/2012  10:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wdpayne to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think this coin may be more interesting than a real one... I'm sure it passed through many hands. I'm curious where it was made.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 09/27/2012  11:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
wdpayne The coin is a Contemporary Circulating Counterfeit which we have assigned to Class 1. The coin is a Thin Sheffield Plate which is well attached (probably hot rolled) over a coppery debased silver core. The total content of 25% silver is likely correct. The surface tends to read high on XRF because of the intermix of the silver and copper at the line of demarcation. The hot weld rolled process did result in a blurred transition area. If you can point test using XRF on a cleaned core area you should notice a wide variation in Ag.

The origin of most Sheffield plate (hot weld) with nicely punched dies is usually the Birmingham area of England. But we can not preclude a manufacturer in the US (NY or New England) or France either. Likely made for use in Mexico, Canada or the US - possibly a place like Indonesia but unlikely for the China trade. The Chinese did not like Ferdinand's face.

It is a nicer (condition) than the average copy for this variety and would make a better looking entry than we presently have. The coin that has been photographed for the book is slightly higher in grade than your coin but your photo is far superior. If you would like your picture included - I can copy the picture and substitute it for the one we have provided you send permission for us to do so.

The coin has been assigned GNL # 1817-O: D / R: Mo TH-002 Yours is the 3rd or 4th known copy at present. For any specific CCC variety that is a scarce type. Most CCC coins by a wide margin are actually unique. Anything over 10 is COMMON.

There are 5 different 1817 varieties that use Mo with the TH assayer. So it is not a rare combination. That is the most common mint assayer combination for the specific year. Two of the 1817 forgeries have Charles IIII instead of Ferdinand. Those were likely headed to China and are scarcer.

Nice coin - the kind I love.

People reading this thread should note in particular the well executed edge design. That too is typical of the Birmingham varieties. When they got the dies right they were capable of fooling the experts of that day. However, for the record the edge is NOT correct - care to guess what's wrong with it?


jfransch Did you get my note asking for permission to use the pictures of your 1801 Mo FT CCC for the book?
New Member
wdpayne's Avatar
United States
38 Posts
 Posted 09/28/2012  08:44 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wdpayne to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You are welcome to use my photos. The edge looks a little more exact than my genuine 1801 Potosi coin but I don't know what the inaccuracy is. The wrong designer's initials and date positioning are dead giveaways to me. Thanks for the information - this coin is way more interesting now that it has a story. Any idea what such a coin would be worth? I'm not selling it (why would you sell a coin you like?) but I'm curious.

I am a chemist so I'm particularly interested in the manufacturing processes to make Sheffield plate.
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 09/28/2012  11:14 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There is an XRF and SEM/EDS study coming out in the next ANS Colonial Newsletter - December/January 2013. As with Birmingham ware for the working class of England the Sheffield process is a fusion type process of good silver being hot worked over onto a copper core as Bob Gurney described. Wilkipedia does a good overview. The SEM/EDS analysis confirmed its just a metal bonding or fusion of these two metals (i.e., silver and the debased alloy which is usually a copper alloy with some zinc and rarely tin). This is why they are so difficult to spot and many exist in PCGS/NGC holders in higher grades (AU and above) particualry if the specimen has shown no signs of peeling as their weight were generally also perfect (i.e., 26.5 grams). The Sheffield process was very durable. I consider it the best executed world contemporary counterfeit in all the coinages prior to 1900. The book on these Portrait CC8R's is currently being worked on and will be released by the ANS in late 2013. Its not only for Spain or Spanish American collectors but for everyone as it goes into why contemporaries were made, how they were made, different alloys examined by XRF Surface Analysis and how to spot current Chinese fakes which indirectly is relevant to all coinages. It will set the bar higher than any book previously published for any group of contemporary counterfeits whether U.S. or World.

John Lorenzo
United States
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 09/28/2012  12:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Briefly Sheffield plate can be thought of as the first Modern Clad coin or an industrialization of a Roman Fouree technique rediscovered by accident.

Roman forgeries (the fourees) were made by putting a silver foil over a copper core and striking the three layers together to produce a mechanical bond.

The Sheffield plate process welds two silver layers to a copper ingot (fillet size) using heat or rollers to make a bonded or welded material that rolls as a unit with all three layers stretching proportionately. Core metals changed over time but the need to create a fusion of materials that would draw without cracking one layer did preclude some matings of metals.

Done correctly it produces a great fake until wear or a test cut goes through the silver plate. Uncut Sheffield's are prizes - John is correct about some of them being in slabs already.

The value of a Contemporary Counterfeit is based on what the buyer is willing to pay and the dealer's understanding of what he has. There are NO red books for counterfeits and no weekly trends. It is not an area of collecting that is plagued by the Sheldon scale or speculative investors.

When I started collecting counterfeit 8R's back in the early 1960's they were things no one wanted. Being a teenager I didn't have a lot of money so it was perfect for me. Over time I came to appreciate that many of the early counterfeits APPEARED ONE TIME and then were gone. I learned never to turn one down - as long as I could afford it (beg, borrow or steal that is).

I remember a particular counterfeit an 1825 Mo that was sold 36 years ago in a Boston auction (November, 1976). At the time, I never paid much over $5-6 for any counterfeit 8R because it was the "prevailing" market price in New England and New York. This one was special - high grade VERY distinctive crude die. Only two bidders once it past $3 - me and a much older fellow (I did not know him but he was not a local - a south westerner based on his accent). I decided to outbid the guy - but had to give up when the bid got to $80. I was making less than $200 a week and my wife would have "killed me". My previous high was $25 which I thought was a rip off price. So I said to myself "another will turn up" and stopped bidding.

But the point of the story is what the old fellow said after the auction that in his experience the coin was UNIQUE and I would never see one again.

So far, he has been correct. I have never seen one like that since - and I HAVE hunted for 36 years.

Today you see JUNK counterfeits priced at astronomical prices - because the owner "THINKS" they are old rarities when in reality they are junk and CCC's still priced under $10 because the owner thinks they are Modern Junk and he does not know what he has.

This happens because there is a VAST VOID in the collective Numismatic community about the true rarity and potential for interest in the older historic circulating counterfeits.

The only solution is to publish the facts as we can dig them out and hope people start to appreciate what they are. But old mindsets are hard to break.

The Sheffield's of your type were originally made in VERY large numbers and are the ONLY type in general (made before 1830) which I would call "common" but that is by Counterfeit (CCC) standards. A Common CCC coin means there may be 50 survivors.

Recalling earlier threads on value - at this point - it must be said that RARITY alone is not a price setter. Interest is what increases value.

But on average, if I was bidding on ebay for something like your coin I would Hope to get it for $60 (reasonable) but not be surprised at $120 (full value) and not be really mad at $180 (overpriced). But if I believed the coin to be unique and distinctive my bid would be MUCH higher.

I already happen to own the type but yours would be an upgrade for me.
Edited by swamperbob
09/28/2012 12:17 pm
New Member
wdpayne's Avatar
United States
38 Posts
 Posted 10/02/2012  1:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wdpayne to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks. I picked this one up about 7 - 8 years ago for $15. The story makes it a very interesting coin - probably more so than a genuine 8R. Thanks for the information - now I know what I have.
New Member
wdpayne's Avatar
United States
38 Posts
 Posted 10/02/2012  1:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wdpayne to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm interested to know what the inaccuracies are with the edge of this coin..
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 10/02/2012  3:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can not see the overlaps - but they are likely incorrect. Often only one.

But in the segment shown the O's are not all identical and the long axis of the rectangles is not aligned well.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 10/12/2012  2:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Bob, was reviewing some completed ebay items and saw this: I *think? it's the same forgery:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1817-Mo-TH-...330785093794

He has some very good photos posted... you should grab them before they go away.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 10/13/2012  01:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1817 from ebay is a coin that I now have in my possession. It arrived last Monday and I photographed it today. It takes a pretty good picture.

It is in fact an identical Obverse die match. I have not yet typed the reverse die - but will before I do the write up on it. I need to replace the one we have.
New Member
wdpayne's Avatar
United States
38 Posts
 Posted 11/29/2012  2:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wdpayne to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Have you got pictures of your new piece? I couldn't retrieve them on ebay. I'm interested in seeing what this coin looks like compared to mine.
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 4,493Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Forums