Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

A New Type Portrait Counterfeit/Forgery

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 58 / Views: 7,059Next Topic
Page: of 4
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2013  10:06 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There is another 1787 Mexican 8R with similar scenario to the previous 1788 piece shown here. Specifications of this coin: S.G. 10.214 (82.6%Ag), 26.76g, 38.3-38.4mm, one edge overlap and similar diagonal cut at the edge as the previous one. Small size, some Chinese character chops and same ringe test. According to swamperbob's presumption, this is another Boston type Class 2 counterfeit minted as the same period of time. See pictures:
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery

The upper one is the 1787 specimen while the lower one is the previously shown 1788 piece.A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery

Squares and circles look so similar to both coins.
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery

The bump at the right-handed side is the only overlap of the 1787 piece.
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2013  1:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1787 is certainly a counterfeit and I would believe likely a class 2 based on appearance - it does have the small line at the corner of the right side window.

That feature is also seen on Class 3 coins so in this case I might want a confirming XRF to make the final decision.

The two facts we KNOW with no doubt are;

1. The coin IS COUNTERFEIT
2. The coin IS NOT a CLASS 1 Contemporary Circulating Counterfeit.
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2013  7:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you your input swamperbob. Both the 1787 and 1788 8R, one was bought in HK and the other from ebay (US) randomly, they are turned out to be Class 2 CC probably. Dose this means the number of existing Class 2 counterfiets exceeds the original overwhelmingly? By your experience, would you make a guess the ratio of original, the C2CC and Class 3 modern forgery in the common numismatic markets? I don't put Class 1 CC here because I know this is the minority. Would you like to share your experience to us here?
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2013  10:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The ratio of Class 2 to original 8 reales is a question I have been pondering for some time without coming to a satisfactory resolution. I recall sorting a group of 1000 portrait 8 Reales that came out of China in about 1970 for a Boston dealer. At that time 8Rs cost about $10 each in bulk. I was to sort out the better stuff for sale. The rest were wholesaled. We took in one bag (1000 coins) per month for a long time.

What I noticed was that a great many coins appeared to be counterfeits based on my early theories about one overlap edges. My thoughts were almost entirely based on stories I heard earlier from a forger who had made 8Rs for a living in the 1920's. This whole episode was almost enough to make me abandon my theory until I spoke to the shop owner who had been in the coin business over 40 years. He said - "I know they are fakes and you know they are fakes but as long as they are silver, I can sell them as genuine, because no one cares!"

This "secret" was well known in the trade but not publicised at all. It was story for which no HARD proof seemed to exist. Just stories.

Recently, since the Internet and the publication of numerous old rare reprints in hardcover and on CD, facts have come to light that point to the probability that Class 2 coins actually outnumber the originals substantially. The reasons are tied to how the coins were treated after they reached China in the first part of the 19th century.

Nearly everyone knows that "Buddha Dollars" (aka Bustman Dollars or Carolus dollars) were preferred by the interior Chinese tea and silk merchants. It is also well known that this preference could not be satisfied by mint output after 1812 when the output of Carolus dollars ceased. In fact, by 1804 speculation in Carolus Dollars stripped the US of so much silver that all US dollar coin mintages were stopped.

By 1825 a premium of 15% over silver content was AVERAGE for an unchopped high grade Carolus 8R.

Couple this with the fact that the majority of silver coins imported into China before 1838 (mostly 8Rs) were melted into the sycee ingots and you end up wondering how any real ones were left at all. After 1838 a need for export of coin silver arose and the 8Rs were not melted in such great numbers.

By 1838, it is very likely that the 8,000,000 Carolus coins per year which were needed to balance trade payments were Class 2 coins - NOT originals. So the survival rates after 1838 favored the Class 2 coins as well.

The trade of Class 2 coins persisted until at least 1920 and likely until 1935. So how many coins went into China and when and how many came out is critical information no one seems to possess.

We do know how many 8Rs were made by Mexico, Peru and Bolivia and the total of all these mintages COMBINED is not large enough to satisfy the demands of China during the 1812 to 1930 period of time. Not enough Carolus coins were made in all the mints combined.

The key to determining the survival ratio lies in the import and export archives for Canton and Shanghai. If the records were kept (I fear that is a very big if) then the raw numbers of imports and exports could be determined. If production of sycee were recorded somewhere as well these could be deducted. Then to the official numbers you need to estimate the number of Portrait 8R coins smuggled into China from 1856 to 1935 and the number made IN CHINA itself. You see in 1856 the Mexican Eagle Dollar was formerly recognized as the standard for currency transactions and was officially placed on a par with the Bustman or Buddha dollar. After 1856 a duty was levied on the Carolus dollars to stop their import.

Interdiction of smuggled shipments are recorded into the 20th century - so avoiding the import duty was an incentive to smuggle the prized coins INTO China even after 1900. By 1900 the premium value attached to the unchopped MS grade Carolus dollars was 26% over silver.

The peak premium recorded was 80% OVER SILVER MELT for a Carolus Dollar. The incentive to forge (re-strike unofficially) was enormous.

This is an area that I hope my book (which covers all the facts in detail) will spark additional research. I have over the past 30 years dug out all the facts I could. Someone needs to carry on. The facts are sketchy but taken together they do paint a rather complete outline of a vast international undertaking that eventually produced 10's if not 100's of millions of silver restrikes of the Carolus Dollar (Class 2 counterfeits). It is the remnant of these same coins that are now finding their way out of China and right back to where they were made in the US, UK and Europe.

Class 2 coins in the US market today are a good example proving the old adage
Quote:
"What goes around comes around".
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2013  11:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I recall sorting a group of 1000 portrait 8 Reales that came out of China in about 1970 for a Boston dealer.

Swamperbob,
Just a little doubtful fact about the time period, was it mid-1970 or late 1970s or even early 1980s? The Cultural Revolution of China was from 1966-1976, after that period of time, China became a little open and they shipped silver coin abroad to exchange daily necessity. I would guess what you picked at that time might be some sorts of smuggling. What had happened in Hong Kong at the same time was also happened in US.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 04/14/2013  12:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coins may have come from Hong Kong, I was not involved in buying them at that time. It had to be before the dealer died in 1978 or 1979 and before the silver boom whenever that was. All I know is that they arrived in burlap sacks. They were often very dirty and many were chopped. That was right after I got out of the Navy 1970 or very early in my marriage 1972 and long before I had enough money to buy many coins. Possibly as late as 1974-1976. After that the dealer was not active and I went to work at a different shop 1976.

I had not thought of it before you brought it up, but Hong Kong was not then part of China. It was still British.

I know the boss always said China. I was only cleaning the dirt off and sorting them.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2013  1:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Pillar of the Community
tokenmast's Avatar
United States
648 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2013  2:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tokenmast to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice really like those windows!

Denticals under date are nice too!

Is the portrait really on a step?
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2013  2:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I hope the buyer wanted a silver retrike of some sort.

These are showing up all over. I have seen 4 new examples this week outside of ebay. I even saw one in an NGC slab.

I have 5 confirmed forgeries based on the ONE LAP edge as well. So it would appear that the damaged stamp is one made by a counterfeiter.

Since NONE of the coins so far came from IDENTICAL dies - there are many die pairs out there made with this same punch. This in turn starts to look like a Class 2 operation. None of the coins appears to be cast so that too points to an older operation.

I suspect that this was one of the groups that copied individual die elements from real coins - made their own punches and then punched their own dies for a large scale production. I have also seen copies for each date from 1786 to 1789. That is a four year run. But most graded examples from the same 4 years DO NOT use this punch. So far I have found only 1 in an NGC slab.

I have also in hand confirmed two edges that were made with punches that were incorrect. Original edge punches appear to have always terminated with a rectangle. This rectangle was positioned in the last previous impression of a rectangle so that spacing was controlled. In that fashion the impression of the rectangle never flattens the side of the next circle.

On the two I have now handled recently - they share flat sided circles. I will try to get a photo later today.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2013  8:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
AND ANOTHER 1787... both the obverse and reverse "dies" are different than the one I posted earlier:

His 1786 (not keyhole window) is highly questionable as well, along with one or two others. He also has a run of perfectly legit cob minors going... seller has offered plenty of good material in the past.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1787-FM-Mex...121092659960

A-New-Type-Portrait-Counterfeit/Forgery
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2013  01:34 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
realswatcher Thanks for pointing that one out - I just wrote to Vic to see if he still has it.

The issue is that the coin will really look good. There are even some in NGC holders in high grades. So the sellers are really completely unaware of what they are selling. But as a kid in Massachusetts - the existance of these "counterfeits" was a well known story.

These are restrikes made in the period after 1830 when these coins were no longer available in high grades and the Chinese paid 26% over face value for originals.

These were professional - event government sponsored copies but they are all "unofficial restrikes" like the Birmingham issues of the MTT during WWII. An unauthorized restrike is in all cases - technically a counterfeit.
Edited by swamperbob
04/17/2013 01:41 am
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2013  10:42 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There are a few queries about the Mexican 8R:

Is it true a 18th or 19th Century 8R coin without two edge overlaps be classified as class 2 CC or modern forgery?

Is it true those 8R with goofy keyhole windows also be classified as class 2 CC or modern forgery?

Are there any other features that indicate it is an original? So far, I still don't see an original of an 8R or 1787, 1788 or 1789. I really hope swamperbob's new book will have some originals of these coin shown to us. It seems the problem of Class 2 Contemporary Counterfeit is a very big topic in the field of silver coins collection.

Can XRF be capable enough to differentiate when were the coins made, before or after 1830. If it works, does this mean we can solve the problem of identifying a 8R coin which is original (ca. before 1830)or class 2 CC (1830-1930 struck).
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2013  10:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just checked, the closest 8 reales I have to those 3 dates is a 1790 portrait from Potosi (later king, but with Carolus III portrait) :)
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2013  11:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
One of the problems with debased alloys is that the main substitution metal is copper. Since copper oxidizes and leaches to the surface it can tone to various colors depending on environmental conditions and %Cu level. In the beginning of the ANS-GNL book project Bob Gurney sent me many different colored looking CC8R's thinking they were of VARIOUS type alloys. In most cases they were all debased Ag alloys - even to my surprise. As Bob has mentioned as we proceed in the 19thC testing and weight measuring methods improved forcing the counterfeiters to add more Ag into the counterfeits to the regal level. Probably. Again we are only talking Cu and Ag in various quantities in a billon type alloy. Once we see zinc (brass), tin (bronze) we enter Class 1 - generally. So to answer your question ... can XRF pinpoint a time period. In my opinion - depends on the time period - mid - late 19thC and a probable Class 2 - Yes. With - 100% certainty - No. As with contemporary counterfeits- nothing is written down - so assumptions are made. The more examples we examine the more valid these assumptions. There is for this series some documentation of general CC8R operations. These are in the appendices of the book. In your case with the three 8R's sent to me - one registered 85% Ag and the other two Ag~92%. So we assume the one 85% Ag is Class 2. The other two regal based on Ag level. Bob has a better understanding of working with the XRF data due to all the CC8R's he has handled - you also have to consider the diagnostics like these castle windows. In the GNL book we break down all the Class 1-4 diagnostic qualifiers for the reader. As I mentioned in previous posts most 20th/21stC modern fakes are of different alloys like the current cast die transfer pieces from China with alloys like Fe/Ni, Brass/low Ag and German Silver (Cu/Zn/Ni) type alloys. Again these exhibit dull surfaces, smooth/new looking type rims with few contact marks and not aged and the obverse/reverse appear UNC but show wear on the high points from the high circ. pieces used for the die transfer process. Once this GNL book is read cover to cover your chances of being stuck with a CC8R is near zero ... not zero ... in todays world we are all victims occasionally. <BG>.

John Lorenzo

John Lorenzo
United States
Edited by colonialjohn
04/17/2013 2:08 pm
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2013  11:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
wonghinghi

The edge will identify a counterfeit - but the number of overlaps will not determine the type of counterfeit. The originals all will have paired overlaps - normally only ONE pair. On a rare occasion there can be two pairs because of a blank being edged twice. Any coin with 1 or 3 laps is a automatically a counterfeit PERIOD.

So while there is only one correct edge there are hundreds of possible wrong edges.

The single overlap edge can and does occur on all classes of counterfeit. There are Class 1 contemporary counterfeits with no edge design at all as well as with 1,2,3,... up to 7 overlaps. There are also a few rare cases where each edge figure is punched in ONE AT A TIME.

Many Class 2 counterfeits have 1 overlap, some 2 and a few more than 2. The hardest part is that many Class 2 coins still can not be identified easily.

Class 3 Numismatic forgeries can have blank edges, or any number of overlaps.

The keyhole/porthole type is definitely a counterfeit in my opinion. But which type of counterfeit is still uncertain. Some appear to be Class 2 and some Class 3. They are definitely NOT class 1 contemporary counterfeits.

The book is not meant to show what each original coin looks like. That can be very easily assembled by anyone with an interest. All you need to assemble a complete listing of what original 8Rs looked like is to go to the Heritage Auction archives and the Stacks archives and search for each date, mint and assayer. I always look for two or three examples that use the same punches before settling on one example. I assembled a set of "correct" 8Rs about a year ago. They are all graded AU of higher. So that is my "virtual" collection of originals. They tend not to change much at all year to year and are as my co-author Gordon Nichols says "VERY BORING." You must keep in mind that when the mint broke a punch they simply took another one made from the master matrix block to replace it.

I used my virtual collection to start looking for deviant punch varieties. They identify counterfeits VERY well. It makes an interesting sub-set of collectibles to see how many different masonry patterns you can locate in the various castles.

I did actually find one or two of the keyhole/porthole varieties in slabs but that is very few when contrasted with genuine coins with rectangular windows. One of the slabbed keyhole types also had the slot mouth king. A super error by NCS.

Of course since the TPGs have even slabbed Riddell counterfeits it was not a big surprise to find a silver restrike or two slabbed.

Up until this point in time very few people even know the Class 2 coins exist. Most people who knew about the type died before 1970. It yused to be fairly common knowledge but is one of those facts that has been forgotten and needs re-discovery. The members of this forum have actually seen almost the full development of my theory on Class 2 in the years since I joined.

The internet and books on CDs has been a windfall to NUmismatic research providing access to books the average collector never dreamed even existed.

Henry you are absoultely right when you say that
Quote:
It seems the problem of Class 2 Contemporary Counterfeit is a very big topic in the field of silver coins collection.


I am hoping to introduce the average coin collector to this new spectrum of forgeries that have been overlooked for decades but have existed in some cases for over 180 years.
  Previous TopicReplies: 58 / Views: 7,059Next Topic
Page: of 4

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.52 seconds to rattle this change. Forums