| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 3,970 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1372 Posts |
I will be sending this one to Rick Snow when it gets here. I just bought it on ebay. Funny thing is ... even though it was cheap, I was a few dollars short in my paypal account, so I figured I'd blow out a common date Peace dollar to get some quick cash. I grabbed a 23-s, and took a picture ... and danged if it isn't clashed with the reverse of the Monroe Doctrine centennial half dollar. I sat that back and sold a 1921 Morgan instead. Chance  |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
I see an upside down reversed image of a 1907 cent with bad scratches.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1372 Posts |
That's what I saw at first too ... scratches. It's the drapery folds at Liberty's right leg. There's another one I'm going to buy if I can .... that has the date in roman numerals on it. It would take more than a miracle for one to get scratched like that.
This is my busy season or I could fart around making an overlay. I don't need to though. I can see all that I need to by enlarging it with my software.
I'll do an enlargement of our scratches ... and maybe that will help the skeptics.
Chance
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1372 Posts |
Still think this is scratches? I don't. I'm an artist and engraver. I can't imagine how this gets scratched by happenstance. Chance  Edited by Chancellor Sutler
07/10/2013 1:57 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1372 Posts |
Here's the Peace dollar I almost "offed" to buy the indians. That's a pretty wild "do". Included a picture of normal hair for the Peace dollar. Chance   |
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
They look like scratches to me too.
There is metal movement.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote:
They look like scratches to me too.
There is metal movement. Some people call them gouges because of the width but whatever you call them, they look like PMD in the images. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1372 Posts |
Reposting the original image of the coin. The designers stylized initals are emblazoned on the indian's cheek....and there is a lot of other stuff too, Chance  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Scratches. They don't look like clashmarks, don't appear to match the gown lines, if the designers initials were on the cheek that area of the field would not be by the gown lines, and the cheek is the deepest void in the die there is no way the designers initials could be clashed at that point. Sorry it all looks like PMD to me. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Not to be a bummer or anything, but I'm in agreement--I don't see clash marks either.
When dies clash, the fields strike first, preventing most if not all incuse details from transferring.
So the drapery folds would be very difficult to transfer. What you would see first is the outline of a figure.
This is why a common clash on IHCs is the wreath outlined around Liberty's head--but no wreath detail is transferred.
Edited by DVCollector
07/11/2013 1:47 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8516 Posts |
I just see a badly abused cent.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
 multi denominational clashes are very cool though I waited a long time to find the right 1864LM FS-901 clashed w/ Indian Head cent to add to my collection. Even ran a contest on it after I won the coin on ebay here on CCF! "Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440Edited by westcoin
07/12/2013 01:22 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1372 Posts |
Maybe I'm mis-using the word clash ... probably the wrong vernacular. I see a lot of coins though .. that have devices on them that simply don't belong there. The most recent is this 1875 seated half. It has foreign devices transferred to the fields. The closest thing I can come up with is the Belgium 20 franc coin, which was a gold coin, so it couldn't be an undertype. Plus ... it's reversed. I also bought a Flying Eagle cent that had pieces of struck scrap between the die and the planchet, and which left impressions of part of the hair braids and cord from a Liberty quarter eagle impressed into the coin's devices. Those are not reversed, and are incuse. Take a look at this seated half....maybe I'm just plain "nuts". You'll have to enlarge the image to see the detail. If you don't know how t do it, display the jpeg ina seperate window, and while holding down the "control" key, press the "+" key. Every tie you hit "+" it increases the size of the image by 25%. Chance  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1372 Posts |
I just tried to look at the seated half image ... and by the time the image "optimizer" ... miser might be more accurate, by the time it compresses it ... it becaomes difficut to "read". I will publish an enlarged image to my IMGUR account and post it here.
Chance
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1372 Posts |
I now have this IHC in hand and am more convinced than ever that this occured during striking. The "scratches" have details within them that could only have occurred during striking. I am going to buy a camera to take really close up pictures. I'll post pictures of this when I get it. Chance. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1372 Posts |
I took this picture with my fuji finepix andhand held close up filters from my old Canon SLR Chance  |
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,970 |
Posted 07/10/2013 1:19 pm
