| Author |
Replies: 37 / Views: 3,862 |
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
Edited by Goldmember333 01/04/2014 11:33 pm
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
We need pictures of both sides of both coins and in better focus, please  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
A Roman coin at a site in Los Angeles? I hope it was private property.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
doing best I can the images have to be pretty small on here, resizing blurs them...
I hope someone can still help me out.. thanks!@
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
yup, at an old torn down mansion site that was known to house miners/prospector/and nuns early 1900s :)
Edited by Goldmember333 01/04/2014 11:25 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
 to the community. Can you take better pictures the ones you posted are not clear enough to really tell who they are. They do however appear to be late Roman.
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
To my untrained eye looks like late 300s Honorius copper or VALENTINIEN II (375-392) copper, that is if they made copper coins during this time?
I will post new pics see if I can do better. I cleaned them up a little bit too there was a lot of dirt left on them. Its kind of hard to post larger clearer pics when they require them to only be 100kb? (small)I had to resize them quite a bit, they aren't that clear to begin with and the coins are in really rough shape. I will try and get some better ones next couple days.
I agree with late roman assuming they kept making copper coins like this and siliqua's I'm thinking they might be Honorius copper? that's the best match so far but they aren't exact as the ones I have seen but darned close!
Unfortunately the outside where the lettering would be (giving name) is pretty much gone or barely there on the small one only backside.
thanks for doing best you can with what I gave you guys to work with. I will do my best to get some better shots though this might be as good as it gets for now
Edited by Goldmember333 01/05/2014 03:25 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Not copper. Bronze.
Yes, first one appears late Roman.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
 A full ID will need better pictures, but I can get pretty close. Both coins have the same reverse type, SPES REIPVBLICAE (Hope for the Empire), which is not a common thing in itself. The one at the top is almost certainly Constantius II whilst the second one is almost certainly Julian II, going by the bust shape. But I must stress that this is conjecture - some surviving legend would be needed to be sure - it looks like the top one has easily enough legend surviving and I'm guessing the bottom one might too, as they differed in their titles. Heres a page with pictures of the type, the legends you could expect and mints which issued it.
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
Thanks Ben, for the links and info.. For sure I can take more pics... btw here is the original thread showing larger pics of the coins, I can post new ones here as well (next couple of days) http://metaldetectingforum.com/show...#post1899238 Im really sorry the pics aren't that clear, the coins were really in rough shape also giving the illusion of blurring the image, when it wasn't blurred that much, I hadn't really cleaned them off that well yet I had just found them, Today cleaned off the loose corrosion on both coins with a toothbrush and the face on the front of the smaller one has now come through, and it verifies they are ANT/Sa also on the back of the smaller I can see the legs so it is clearer.. Does anyone know what the writing is on the Right side of the coins (the larger pics might help with this) looks to me it name on left year etc on right? THANKS@
Edited by Goldmember333 01/05/2014 08:44 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Larger pictures arent necessary, we need clearer. Try taking a picture focusing on the surviving writing.
The writing is the legend I provided - SPES REIPVBLICAE. Yours only have the PVBLICAE bit left. On the other side, with the bust, you'll have the end of the name and some of their titles. There are never dates - as you'd recognise them - on roman coins, as they used the regnal year system.
The top one reads DN CONSTANTIVS PF AVG and was produced between 337-361, this one being in later style so towards the end of the reign.
The bottom one reads FL CL IVLIANVS P F AVG or DN CL IVLIANVS NOB CAES (or something to that effect, variations exist for both) and was between 361-363.
I recommend against cleaning with tap water. Find some distilled water - tap water has ions in it which will adversely effect the coin given time.
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
one seemed more magnetic are they bronze or copper? just curious! thanks so much for helping me ID these! I really appreciate your tips on cleaning them too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
They certainly shouldnt seem magnetic. they are likely Bronze, but the romans at this point were using all sorts for their coins - you can find copper, bronze and occasionally Orichalcum (brass, recycled from old Sestertii). Billon even crops up on rare occasions (silver mixed with bronze), if ebay is to be believed. Bit curious that they were found in LA...how did that come to be?
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
The Julian II slides off the magnet when tipped, but TheConstantius II does not. Both appear to be copper, maybe the CII is bronze hence the stick?
How did they get there? Ya. I'm asking myself that question!
they must certainly have a backstory.... I know it sounds crazy to people I live in LA, out come the skeptic's and comedians... but I'm not laughing (yet) The relic site used to have a Mansion nearby (must keep it a secret) without giving too much away, I read the owner was also a MASON so I decided to check it out. There reportedly were many famous prospectors/miners that stayed there over the years, while they hunted for GOLD and mined looked for Gold in the hills around LA. (there are some mines nearby) don't know if this matters in the story but Catholic Nuns were known to have lived at this site at some point?
I dont think the are reiplica's They sure look very old under magnification. Is there a way to check?
thanks for all the help!
Edited by Goldmember333 01/05/2014 08:39 am
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
They shouldnt be at all magnetic. Nto even slightly. They dont look like fakes, though. Ill take a magnet to mine and see if I can find any which are slightly magnetic.
Update: What do you know? I have some magnetic coins too.
|
| |
Replies: 37 / Views: 3,862 |