| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 5,592 |
|
New Member
Bulgaria
16 Posts |
I didn't found this coin in hafner catalog. May be is not written or I wrong?  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Korea, Republic Of
1881 Posts |
It is a modern restrike, so it may not be listed....?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
865 Posts |
It looks really odd to me. There's a lot about this coin that doesn't look right.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
Although these photos limit what you can say definitively about this specimen, the things I notice are the low periods in the "S.F." and the areas of weakness in the legend and devices on the reverse. The brooch on the obverse looks to be lacking the expected detail in the surrounding pearls, too.
This is not as widely counterfeited a coin as some others, but just to be safe, have you at least weighed it yet?
Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Hong Kong
1270 Posts |
This is an old MTT restrike. Likely to be a H28, Gunzburg minted 1789-92 according to Hafner's Lexicon. I still need austrokiwi to confirm, he is an expert to this MTT restrikes. Henry
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
865 Posts |
I thought the SF meant it was minted from late 19th century to present.
|
|
Valued Member
South Africa
453 Posts |
Its a older restrike I think avst is new restrike but aust like yours is a older restrike
|
|
New Member
 Bulgaria
16 Posts |
Thanks, Henry! Yes, that's right. I have other coin like this one with different write "SF"
|
|
New Member
 Bulgaria
16 Posts |
..now here.   If you know H28_ _?!
Edited by en4eff 06/28/2014 06:31 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
the coin is probably H29 ( very similar to H28). Struck between 1789 and 1792. It looks primitive compared to the modern re-strike because it was struck from hand engraved dies using a screw press. The faults that someone identified are typical of the engraving and striking method. It looks genuine to me. But to confirm please post a picture of the edge specifically the cross like decoration you should find on the side. Current retail value for that coin would be around US$300.00.
The mint signature SF was not a 19th century addition. Mint signatures were added to Austrian Thalers in 1766. the mint signature is made from the initials of the Mint master (Tobias Shöbl) and mint warden(Joseph Faby). The coin does not have a mint mark Mint marks were placed on some coins but not Günzburg MTTs after 1766. The mint marks used were:"G" during Maria Theresa´s life time then changed to "H" by her son after her death( perhaps to prevent confusion with Graz mint; assuming it was still open at that time)
Edited by austrokiwi 06/28/2014 08:46 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Hong Kong
1270 Posts |
Austrokiwi, mint mark of H29 has two pairs of colons while of H28 is full stop. So this is a H28 variety.
En4eff, the second coin you post looks different from the first one. Can you provide larger pictures for identification. As austrokiwi spoke, edge pictures are always helpful. Henry
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
I can see why the first specimen could be identified as an early restrike. However, one further characteristic that I note as needing an explanation is the close spacing of the "S.F." which seems atypical.
Edit: Am I the only one who thinks that getting a weight (and maybe a diameter, too) besides just photos is important data for evaluating a coin like this?
Colligo ergo sum
Edited by Lucky Cuss 06/28/2014 11:53 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Hong Kong
1270 Posts |
Yes, the weight of the coin is the very first preliminary idea to determine a coin fake or not. But up to now, I still not see a high grade counterfeit of this MTT restrike probably there is a vast number of such specimens in the markets. It is not worthy to make a forgery of this type. Henry
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
Quote: Edit: Am I the only one who thinks that getting a weight (and maybe a diameter, too) besides just photos is important data for evaluating a coin like this? weight helps but you do have to take into account 18th century tolerances were not as good as they are today so the weight can vary around o.1 gram for early re-strikes. As for diameter.....its not that helpful unless the diameter is ridiculously out of sync. The MTT was struck with out a collar...also with screw presses the striking pressure could vary these two factors can see coins(from that era) can varying (40-42 mm)
|
|
New Member
 Bulgaria
16 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 Bulgaria
16 Posts |
Edited by en4eff 06/29/2014 03:05 am
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 5,592 |