| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,189 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1959 Posts |
I'll take a stab at it and say AU-58. Super clash on the reverse. Color is nice and even. Almost too even. Not convinced one way or the other on whether it is original or not. Could be MS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Can't tell much about the luster - if it's reasonably good, I'd agree that this could be 64BN. Certainly 58 at worst. Nice coin.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Let me try...MS64 brown. The clash does not add value if you are not collecting clashes,if your looking for a 1904 for a set you would not want the clash. I really like the look of it. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8521 Posts |
I love the obverse clash. I'll go MS63BN.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1021 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Beautiful coin, MS-64BN.. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Rub at feather tips 2 and 3 on obverse shows the slightest circulation. No trace of cleaning. Solid AU 58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
521 Posts |
BN-63, nice even toning and surfaces look good. I think I like these better than the RB's
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Mox - don't think apparent rub on these feathers is diagnostic in my experience. Need evidence of wear on the high ponts first. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Tad bit of wear on the hair and feathers. AU-58BN. Still a beautiful coin, might pull off an UNC grade.
|
|
New Member
United States
42 Posts |
MS-63...no apparent luster left
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,189 |
|