Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Please Explain/Enlighten What Terms On TPG Slabs Mean.....

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 7,446Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member

Canada
402 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2016  01:08 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add cdngmt to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Sorry to ask what is probably a silly question but when the slab says things like
1) AU details ....does this mean the coin is AU or only some features are AU like ?
2) what would a qualifier on a slab like corroded mean ? i.e. if the coin is corroded how can it carry a grade of say EF ?

Any explanation that would clarify how to rate the relative condition of a coin with either of these (or other)qualifiers vis a vis similiar graded coins without would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for all answers

*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***


Pillar of the Community
kanga's Avatar
United States
5825 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2016  08:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kanga to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Basically DETAILS means the coin has been altered in some way, generally by being cleaned.
AU DETAILS means that IF the coin hadn't been altered it would have graded in the AU range.

"Corroded" is used in place of DETAILS when the TPG can used a more descriptive term for the problem.
Otherwise it means the same as above.

IMO a grade for such coins should never be given.
It gives newbie sellers to place an artificially high price on a coin.
And newbie buyers end up paying more than a coin's worth.
IMO only the problem should be noted on the slab and let the buyers and sellers determine its value.
Edited by kanga
02/22/2016 08:47 am
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2016  10:44 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
a details (problem) coin label should read - Genuine followed by the description of the condition rendering it un-gradable.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
BigSilver's Avatar
United States
2843 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2016  11:39 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BigSilver to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I do not .
If a coin is super rare, the only hope many people have of "filling" is with a problem one. There are some coins that definitely should be graded with details grades. Everything is out in the open. It says the problem so there is no trickery. If people are overpaying for them- that's their problem. Additionally, there are times that the details grade is given and the buyer feels that the coin is actually not cleaned. They now have a grade assigned to it, which they would otherwise not have.
Yesterday, at a large coin show I was shown a coin that had an "Artificial toning" label from NGC which the seller was sure that was explainable in a natural way. (He is the seller, but was previously the buyer, and he felt that when he bought it as well, already in the slab.)
The point I am trying to make is that the TPG should say what they think and allow for the consumer to determine on their own if they want the coin. They are not responsible for what people do with the grade.
IMHO
Pillar of the Community
Broken-Coin's Avatar
United States
1812 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2016  12:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Broken-Coin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Isn't a Net Graded problem coin already reduced by one grade ?

I also agree Detail slabs should have a grade assigned to the coin..
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2016  9:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Go to NGC and PCGS websites. Your question is answered straight from the horse's mouth
Pillar of the Community
Numisma's Avatar
United States
4963 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2016  9:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Numisma to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I also agree Detail slabs should have a grade assigned to the coin..

I also agree for the same reasons that Big Silver listed. You buy the coin, not the slab.
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts
 Posted 02/23/2016  01:28 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cdngmt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Firstly. A sincere thanks for the replies, they really are enlightening. Mostly I've seen only ICCS graded coins and found the "details" qualifier quite confusing.
I do beg to differ with some of the opinions expressed.
TPG's are in effect holding themselves out as offering a somewhat objective standardized evaluation (and hence value) that eliminates/reduces subjective interpretations. As in any quality evaluation system (meat grading/diamonds/lumber) it should be universally clear and applicable by all parties in the same way. The idea that you ought to buy the coin not the slab is the antithesis of this. I may value coloured diamonds higher or lower than someone else but the grading should be consistent. Likewise meat grading relates to degree of marbling of fat, the cut may determine the taste or tenderness. And who would want a warped 2x4 even if it had a "tight grain" detail.
This is of course only a personal opinion and subject to change depending on the arguments advanced
Pillar of the Community
edweather's Avatar
United States
7375 Posts
 Posted 02/23/2016  01:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add edweather to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Also keep in mind that you can have two of the exact same coin in slabs with the same grade, let's say XF Details for both, and one could be in much better shape that the other. Although both would be XF (and equal) if there were no damage....the details damage can be different on both coins. So to sum it up, each coin has to be evaluated carefully on it's own to determine the exact value. Older US Large Cents come to mind. You can have two 1794 VF details, and one can be worth $200, and the other could be worth $600.
Pillar of the Community
Numisma's Avatar
United States
4963 Posts
 Posted 02/23/2016  02:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Numisma to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
cdngmt- I am a bit hesitant to agree with you. Coin grading is and always has been extremely subjective. TPGs have, like you said, attempted to regulate it more and have been fairly successful. However, it still varies significantly. You can get a coin in a PCGS MS-63 slab, crack it and send it back, and get MS-65. By 'buying the coin, not the slab', you can consider if it is over- or undergraded (hence affecting value) and weigh other factors like eye appeal. This concept applies as much or more to details coins than problem-free ones.
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2016  12:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Interesting discussion.

I look at getting a Details grade is saying the surface
of the coin is not original. By assigning a grade the TPG
is just stating what level of wear the coin is in.


Please-Explain/Enlighten-What-Terms-On-TPG-Slabs-Mean.....

On this coin the TPG is saying the coin has been cleaned.
but the coin has the same level of wear as a AU53 coin.
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2016  01:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cdngmt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi
Again I do appreciate the opinions expressed. I can understand GR58 explanation ...as far as his example goes(ie with cleaned coins. BUT when I saw corroded I really can't see/accept it. To me its double talk akin to its perfect except where its not.
I think the other to commentators are both on the point I'm having such difficulty with. Unless grading is more standardized and will generate the same (or narrow range of )valuation wherever it is evaluated, there is no justification for pricing.
We are in effect buying tulip bulbs, prices and values have no floor, they are fad and whimsy (which is true of course to some degree). If the value is all puffery...why not just catalogue pictures? {we can't really handle the coins with "impairing their value and worth"}
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2016  4:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am not exactly sure where your going with this idea.

Here is another shot at hoping to be more clear.

If you have two coins same date and grade, both TPG slabbed.

But one has a "Details" on the label. The coin with out the
"Details" on the label will sell for more.

When "Details" is added to the label, the TPG's are saying
there is a problem with the coin.

Problems could be
Corroded
Cleaned
Damaged
Environmental damage
Artificial toned
and many other problems.

The TPG's will still give a grade, based on the amount of
wear on the coin. Because you could for example have two
Lincoln Cent. One has full rims, but other main devices of
the coin are gone. No wheat lines, Lincoln head is smooth.
But the surfaces are corroded. Then you have a Lincoln that
has all the wheat lines, Lincoln has hair lines, bow tie and
defined coat lines. But is also corroded.

Both coins are corroded but one still looks better than the
other, the TPG's try to state that.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
BStrauss3's Avatar
United States
4593 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2016  4:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BStrauss3 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Details BAD

It means that the coin was messed with. Altered. Cleaned. Something like that.

Not original.



Now, if your choice (for an exceptionally rare or pricy - given YOUR budget) is between a hole and a details coin, and you know you aren't going to turn around next week or next month or even next year and want to upgrade... a details coin can "fill the hole".

Sometimes that is ALL you are going to get - there simply aren't any original coins in existence. S'be'it.



Net Grading. OK, the coin has been messed with. If it HADN'T been, it would be an XF40.

One school says no net grading, just XF details.
The other school says, "we can approximate how messed with". XF Details, Net VF35 - means just a little. XF Details, Net AG3 - means a lot.
-----Burton
50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973)
Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA
Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club
Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983)

Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2016  5:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
IMO, "net grading" is essentially meaningless. I mean, as if the original grade wasn't subjective enough in the first place! The term might have validity in the structured EAC system, perhaps, but it is a useless distraction otherwise.
Pillar of the Community
KenKat's Avatar
United States
4085 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2016  9:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KenKat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Also sometimes you look at a Details coin and you might think "I don't see it". Remember, the TPG's are still just some guys sitting in a room giving an opinion. They have lots of experience of course but they aren't necessarily perfect.
  Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 7,446Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.48 seconds to rattle this change. Forums