| Author |
Replies: 30 / Views: 3,686 |
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
What does the Boston, Chicago, New York, etc. actually mean? I know that new bills are only printed in Washinton DC and TX, but what about bills from the 20s and 30s?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7075 Posts |
The cities are where the Federal Reserve Banks are.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
The cities were the ones chosen to be the locations of the Federal Reserve banks back in 1913.
Currency was printed for that particular district which then arrived at the Federal Reserve Bank which shipped it out to smaller banks that requested it.
Used to be that notes printed for a district say Kansas City were only distributed in that area whereas today the Fed sends out whatever is in their possession regardless of what district it was printed for.
-MV
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
 and yes, Federal Reserve Banks
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
 to CCF!
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020 In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020 In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
655 Posts |
I would assume the bills were printed on demand. So that, a smaller district, like Minneapolis, would have a smaller run than a district like New York.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187862 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 to the Paper Money Forum!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4637 Posts |
Quote: I would assume the bills were printed on demand. So that, a smaller district, like Minneapolis, would have a smaller run than a district like New York. Yes. Typically the heavy hitters are San Francisco, New York, and Atlanta. Followed by Philadelphia, Chicago and Dallas. Minneapolis, Cleveland and and St.Louis are usually towards the bottom.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
 We look forward to your participation.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
District print runs have shifted dramatically since the introduction of small notes in 1928, as you might expect. In the old days, Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago and even Cleveland often produced the most notes, while Dallas, Minneapolis, Kansas City and St. Louis usually had smaller outputs. It varies by series and denomination, but our westward population shift is clearly reflected in district totals over some 90 years now!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
655 Posts |
I'm a little perplexed as to why the smaller district notes don't seem to matter in determining price.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Prices are very much influenced by district print runs, especially the further back you go. There are other factors at work as well, of course, but like coin mintages, lower print runs will usually bring higher prices. This is not as much the case for items printed or coined during the last, say, 40 years or so, where outputs for all districts and mints have tended to be massive.
Edited by Coinfrog 03/29/2018 4:17 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
655 Posts |
Sorry for the late response but, take this example on a note I recently purchased. It's a 1928B lgs $20 FRN. My current price guide has the Kansas City run of 5 mil at $100 in CU and the Chicago run of 17 mil at $90. An older book I use has the KC run lower at $60 and the G run at $65. Small difference, in both cases. The last auction price I could find for these two districts in PMG Choice-64 was $79 for the G run and $77 for the J run, virtually the same.
I know there's a big difference on NBN's when it comes to state chartered banks where surviving population means everything, but on the common 1928 and 1934 $10 & $20 FRN's that I've been following, I'm finding virtually no price differences in regard to district.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
As I say, there are many factors, but your choices may not be the best comparisons. Note higher valuations for Richmond, Minneapolis and Dallas in the 1928B $20 series, each with lower printings than KC, much less Chicago. There may have been a stash of KC notes discovered at some point.
Other factors: The 1928B $20 FRN series has a huge total printing for all districts, which helps satisfy type collectors. Also, it is not as widely collected as the "numerical" series of 1928 and especially 1928A, which is full of tough notes. By the time the 1934 Series was introduced, print runs were gigantic, relatively speaking, for all the districts, so prices tend to depend more on grading than the district designation.
As a general rule, regardless of denomination, choose a series to collect where the total print run of all districts is comparatively low (1928-A $20), or even an early low denomination series that circulated heavily like the 1928-A $5 issue - I guarantee you'll see significant variations in district valuations.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
I don't know a great amount U.S. notes. (More familiar with banknotes of my own country).
My assumption was that the City was from the particular branch of Federal Reserve Bank that the Note was issued from.
|
| |
Replies: 30 / Views: 3,686 |