| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,903 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19931 Posts |
Edited by BadThad
01/10/2009 11:57 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
367 Posts |
kinda leaning to maybe proof?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
237 Posts |
No proofs were made in 1918, and Denver never made a proof cent.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1179 Posts |
You own this coin? Or what do you mean by ogling?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I thought the master hubs were re-done in 1916? Maybe I'm wrong (about Denver dies) but the late teens generally have great detail.
By the way - That's got great devices! Could be worth $2K-3K?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Keep in mind, even worn dies were relatively fresh at one point....
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
19931 Posts |
No, I don't own it, but thinking about it. LOL
If it's legit, it's the earliest die state/well struck example for this year/mint ever. Go look at ha.com. I don't think anyone would forge one of these, the S is more valuable than the D (lower mintage), but, in conditional rarity, this ones a gem. The MM looks genuine, the D rests in a depression.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
No doubt this coin has been through at least one chemical bath. It is NOT original. For what it is, it does look nice. I do agree that it has a strong strike and little die wear.
I don't know how much you're looking to spend on it, but I would suggest staying under the MS63 level. Although the coin is low on marks, it still has been altered.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19931 Posts |
Quote:
No doubt this coin has been through at least one chemical bath. It is NOT original. For what it is, it does look nice. I do agree that it has a strong strike and little die wear.
I don't know how much you're looking to spend on it, but I would suggest staying under the MS63 level. Although the coin is low on marks, it still has been altered.
BINGO! Exactly what I was waiting for someone to post. I think someone tried to make it a full red coin at some point. What a shame because it's the best detail I've ever seen on an 18D. I suspect it was rejected by a TPG for altered surfaces. Thanks Chuck!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1231 Posts |
So what is the price they were asking for it?
|
|
Moderator
United States
16677 Posts |
Quote:
It is NOT original I agree. The luster is definitely subdued as well as the uneven re-toning. Killer strike! Would make a nice addition even though altered. swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote:
Although the coin is low on marks, it still has been altered. This is an interesting thread. Q. David Bowers repeats several times in a couple of his books that many slabbed full RD Lincolns from this era have been altered. He's talking about PCGS and NGC slabbed coins. Doctoring coins has gotten that good. According to Bowers, many early Lincolns slabbed as RD are actually altered coins putting their price into the stratosphere! Shocking! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19931 Posts |
onejinx - This coin will go over $200. Brad - Yep, I have to agree with Bowers, he repeats that over and over in his book. I actually think most of them were slabbed long ago, before the TPG's figured it out. I've seen many pics on ha.com of coins too clean to be true in slabs. I'm getting pretty good at detecting the dippers. I'd be very surprized if one could slip though today as close as they are looking for that now. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1231 Posts |
I figured it would have been higher.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19931 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,903 |
Posted 01/11/2009 12:02 am
