| Author |
 Replies: 41 / Views: 4,339 |
|
Valued Member
United States
205 Posts |
This 1971D LMC has me scratching my head. The lamination is undamaged on the obverse missing area from the rim at God to Lincolns hair. You can see how it effects the reverse area of the coin and the rim. Should this lead me to believe this was cause during the striking process or was it a prestrike stock issue? If it is a pre strike stock issue my question is why the strike on reverse area was also effected? There also appears to be doubling throughout the obverse and reverse of this LMC but that is not really my concern at this moment. Thanks, Coindom76   Edited by Coindom76
12/11/2021 2:21 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
It looks more like a struck through to me. You can see weakness on the obverse on ONE, it's hard to tell from the photos for me as I suppose it could be damage as well. Will wait to see what others think.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34424 Posts |
I'm leaning toward this being a really nice strike-through. Any chance of you posting a nice close-up of the affected area on the obv? Thx.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
549 Posts |
Looks like a struck through debris on obverse and grease on reverse to me.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
205 Posts |
@Wrekkdd Absolutely, I will take and post close up pics of the affected area today. @vestigeWolf At first glance I thought the reverse was a Greaser too but the rim is affected on reverse and there are other indicators that led me away from that conclusion. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
The weakness on ONE and the rim would be caused by the struck through on the obverse. I don't think I have seen a struck through that also effected the rim like this.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
205 Posts |
@Spence absolutely, I will take pics of the affected areas and post them today
|
|
Moderator
United States
96857 Posts |
I wonder if that was 'dented in' of missing material before the strike. You can see the weak strike on the reverse in the same area. I think that because the material was missing there was not enough pressure to properly form the reverse device.
If it was a massive strike through - the material/grease/whatever that would have been there would allow for the reverse to form properly, but it did not. So, I don't think it was a strike through, but instead a void that was already there then struck.
Edited by Dearborn
12/11/2021 09:27 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19186 Posts |
At this point, I'm warming up to strike through.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
549 Posts |
How much does it weigh? That would explain Dearborns theory.
Edited by VestigeWolf
12/11/2021 09:29 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
205 Posts |
@Wrekkdd the weight on this LMC is 3.1 grams |
|
Valued Member
United States
205 Posts |
Sorry @Wrekkdd
@VestigeWolf the weight is 3.1 grams.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
The weight does not seem to be effected enough for it to be missing metal from the planchette so I think it's a really neat struck through. Very cool.
|
|
Moderator
United States
96857 Posts |
Well then, that is that, but thanks for examining my theory..
Just a strange strike through.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7513 Posts |
coindom76,
can you take a closer shot of the area in question? can you rotate your coin clockwise so the GOD area would be where the date is using the same amount of light?
Edited by Chase007
12/11/2021 11:39 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
If the coin is bent, it would be damage to the coin. So lets see that edge of the coin of the out curvature?
|
| |
Replies: 41 / Views: 4,339 |
Posted 12/11/2021 08:59 am
