| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,078 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
62 Posts |
I haven't come across a divot quite like this on a coin before, so while my default is PMD, I thought I'd get some other opinions. The last picture is a closeup of the reverse side at the corresponding spot.     Thanks for taking a look!
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
392 Posts |
Not an expert, but nice Cud!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34402 Posts |
A Cud would be raised above the field, but the OP describes this mark as a "divot", which makes me think it is incuse instead. A flat spot directly opposite to an incuse mark almost always means that you have damage. Let's see what others think though.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19147 Posts |
Certainly lot a Cud, I'm leaning toward strike through--given the rather 'clean' edges around the divot. Would love to be able to examine this piece in-hand to get a better sense of the feature.
Edited by ijn1944 04/22/2023 08:55 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4135 Posts |
I hope I am wrong but looks like damage. The hit is also on bust and the rev. looks like it has a little bulge which was created by hit.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95630 Posts |
I'm leaning towards PMD. If it were a strike through, it would not affect the reverse and cause a 'weak' strike there. If it was raised, then I could see the weakness of the reverse happening, but the OP states it is incuse. Also on pics 3 and 4, I can see a very slight bulging of the edge - this cannot happen when inside the collar. Can the OP please post up an image of the edge around this area?
Edited by Dearborn 04/22/2023 09:36 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4618 Posts |
Interesting coin! The area on the obverse looks like a true strike through, but that wouldn't explain the reverse which looks to be incuse as well.
Hang on to this one until you get a solid answer. You may need an expert to take a look. Do you know of any coin shops in your area that deal in errors or maybe an upcoming coin show?
ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
defective planchet is a possibility
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95630 Posts |
I still think it is damage. I can see what could be a tool mark on the edge of the bust, and the metal looks like it has 'rolled over' the edge of the coin (which would explain why the rim looks like it is bulging a bit. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
Interesting puzzle. I'm wondering if it started out as an incomplete planchet before strike? Thanks, Doug.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4135 Posts |
Thanks Dearborn that arrow is exactly what I was talking about. To me there is no question of this coin being damaged by a hit mark.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Is now I see this coin. Is interesting. IMHO it is a fancy hit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
Looks to me like a planchet defect. There was a small void on the obverse when struck. That would result in not enough metal to fill in the reverse.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Cud is raised. This is incuse. So it is probably damage to the coin. Still a silver coin. still a melt value coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
I was hoping Mike would weigh in on this one
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
572 Posts |
I tend to agree with Cujohn that a defective planchet is more likely.
The area on the reverse at the rim looks to me as if it's tilting downward slightly, suggestive of not being enough metal or force of strike to cause the metal to flow and form the R.
Also, the area inside the obverse "divot" appears unevenly shaped, particularly on the side by the I. If struck through or with something I would expect more uniformity in contour of the bottom of the divot.
What I would really like to see is a close up of the area of the obverse rim around the date. If the planchet was missing part of it's edge when it went through the upset mill it might produce some Blakesley effect in that area. I think I can see a little in the area of the 96 but would like a closeup to be sure.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,078 |
|