| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 654 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
134 Posts |
Let me know what you all think. High AU or Mid to Low MS? Thank you.   Edited by PaulyD 01/17/2024 08:05 am
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1528 Posts |
I'll say AU-58, very nice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1406 Posts |
I don't see any ware but is that a huge scratch down the reverse?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19183 Posts |
AU58+ for me. Nice example.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
I don't see any wear. MS-63.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74529 Posts |
I'll say MS-63.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15459 Posts |
I see no signs of wear, so I'll go MS64. Please edit your topic title as this is a San Francisco minted coin, not Denver.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
134 Posts |
Oops...sorry for the Typo. Yes this is 1942-S
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5674 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
599 Posts |
AU58. The scratches and green spots knock it out of the MS range
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3327 Posts |
These silver alloy nickels struck and wore differently than the standard versions. I think this is a MS nickel, probably 63-64. I have a pile of MS War Nickels and a good many of them have the "carbon" spots as seen on this one.
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2340 Posts |
Good looking Nic I think it kinda looks like this from the pic's? RRDC-5c-1942S-06R http://cuds-on-coins.com/rim-to-rim...u-s-coins-2/click on the link and scroll down till you get to the 1942-S Nickles (bout halfway or so down the page) and I think that's him? smat
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 654 |
|