| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,400 |
|
New Member
United States
38 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff to Add Denomination to Title. It's very important to have in the title. ***Strange Mercury dime from the Denver mint of an unknown date.This does not look like any PMD that I have seen. However, I really can't identify the cause of this damage. Looking for feedback from the folks here. It may seem the image is blured but, that is the actual surface image. My image files are too large for direct up load. Learning Pixlr and created an account to reduce file size. 
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
38 Posts |
Here are other photos of the problem Denver Dime.  
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16808 Posts |
Your coin has most likely suffered from direct application of intense heat - a blowtorch, or something similar. This causes the surface of the coin to melt and ripple in this fashion.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1484 Posts |
Agree, heat damage of some sort. Date looks like something from the 1940s, based on the third digit.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73747 Posts |
Heat damage, PMD. Only worth silver melt value.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 Weight? John1 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15392 Posts |
 to the CCF
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19120 Posts |
Agree with the heat damage assessment.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1761 Posts |
 With above, PMD (heat damage). @Cybereyes 
Edited by Sharks 02/14/2024 1:19 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
38 Posts |
Solved. Thanks everyone for the info on the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 to the CCF Not heat damage. You can't heat the surface of the coin up to the melting point to where it puddles and not effect the middle of the coin. Especially a coin the thickness of a dime. To me it looks like it was sandblasted with glass beads. Beads wouldn't take very much of the surface off like sand or silicon carbide. The face on the obverse and the fasces on the reverse is where they held it so this area wouldn't get exposed to the beads.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Sandblasting does not give that effect. My first thought was acid damage. What is the weight?
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
425 Posts |
First look I thought acid damage too. With a blow torch or high heat don't you get toning and the coin turns colors?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I lean toward acid as well.  to the CCF!
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16808 Posts |
My problem with the "acid" theory is: which acid does this to coin silver? The usual culprits (hydrochloric acid, coca-cola etc) don't dissolve silver, so shouldn't show this effect. I've seen blowtorched coins posted on the forum before that look exactly like this wavy pattern. Here's Coop's image of a blowtorched cent:  The explanation of the high points knot showing the damage is simple enough: the coin re-entered circulation for a while (or became someone's lucky pocket piece, or was simply buffed down with a polishing cloth) after being torched. The wear patterns on the cheeks and on the fasces look normal enough. Any "blowtorch colors" would also be removed the same way. A weight might help discern the difference with more certainty; a coin this badly acid-etched should be severely underweight, while a blowtorched coin shouldn't have lost much if any weight.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Quote: A weight might help discern the difference with more certainty  John1 
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,400 |