Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall FactoryPin — Custom challenge coins for military, police, and organizations. Global shipping, affordable prices, special discounts for service members!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

Rim Weirdness On 1797 Draped Bust Dimes (Not My Coins)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 522Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Adam590's Avatar
United States
668 Posts
 Posted 01/04/2025  1:19 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Adam590 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hello Forum--I love old dimes. And while these are way above my budget, I am curious about something I noticed on two PCGS graded MS 1797 dimes.

I have attached several photos of 1 (16 stars variety, not that it matters) in an MS(61) holder, which I shared in a post a while back. No one talked about the rim around 9 o'clock on the obverse (I didn't either). The PCGS true view picture shows something is missing, the picture of the same coin I found on a Coinweek article makes it look worse, and a picture of the slab on David Lawrence's sight makes it look better, as plastic covers the missing part.

I also found this 13 stars variety with a much worse strike in an MS(64) holder that also seems to have something missing around 8 o'clock.

Are these rim bumps? Or incomplete planchets? I understand market appeal is subjective, but how do they affect the overall appeal of these coins?








Edited by Adam590
01/05/2025 12:27 am
Pillar of the Community
United States
501 Posts
 Posted 01/05/2025  01:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add adam126402 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If I had the money and the interest, the rim issues (if PMD) on these dimes would be of little concern. They are fabulous. A 220 year old tiny piece of silver (2.7g) without a defect is a near impossibility. The defects here are absolutely tiny. Just my amateur opinion.
New Member
Root River Mint's Avatar
United States
37 Posts
 Posted 01/05/2025  09:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Root River Mint to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Those pictures are taken of coins that are in slabs. What you see is a well cropped picture that still shows the three bits of plastic that hold the coin in position.
Pillar of the Community
Zurie's Avatar
United States
5256 Posts
 Posted 01/05/2025  09:30 am  Show Profile   Check Zurie's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Zurie to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I assume you're talking about that little rim defect at 9:00 in the first coin, and at 8:00 in the second coin. They look like small rim bumps or dents to me.
Pillar of the Community
Adam590's Avatar
United States
668 Posts
 Posted 01/05/2025  4:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Adam590 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks so much, everyone, for your opinions so far. @Root River Mint, I see the plastic bits from the PCGS slabs holding the coins in position, but the rim damage I am asking about is seperate. The 16 star one, in a PCGS MS(61) slab, which all the pictures are of except for one, seems to have a bit missing around 9 o'clock on the obverse. It seems the newer slab, which bears the D. L. Hansen name on the slab, actually hides the dinged/missing portion of the rim behind one of those three plastic bits. The older slab, from an older auction photo, reveals it.

I have seen both of these coins' written descriptions on auction sights, and am wondering why they don't even mention the rim issues. The auction descriptions obviously aim to "sell" the coins, but they often do concede or acknowledge the coin's biggest flaws (hairlines, muted luster, etc). The fact that auction houses don't even acknowledge these rim issues makes me especially curious what is going on with both of these (amazing) coins.
Pillar of the Community
jacrispies's Avatar
United States
3657 Posts
 Posted 01/06/2025  12:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jacrispies to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Interesting observation. I believe in both circumstances that the rim issues are PMD.

Additionally, keep in mind, these coins are already small. So a small rim issue on a small coin would be minor compared to the same % damage on a half dollar or dollar coin. From what I've handled in early dimes, these small rim issues are more than within tolerance for a straight grade. In fact, PCGS is extremely generous with early dimes and Half Dimes.
Suffering from bust half fever.
Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955
Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 522Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    





Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums