| Author |
Replies: 140 / Views: 49,936 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
It's still notable how subjectively "nice" the MZ7 shot is - people here would gush over it had you posted it to show off the coin. Even pushed past its' limit, color and resolution (where it still has any) are wonderful. All the same, the image is save-worthy as a poster child for the terms "vignetting" and "diffraction." In fact, with your permission, I'd like to save that image for future discussions of those two variables in this forum. The Rodenstock, of course, simply leaves me weak.  It can encompass a 40mm FOV, I assume?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
SuperDave...I was thinking the same thing when I posted the images. The differences are actually very subtle on the grand scale of things, especially with the similar lighting techniques, WB compensation, etc. It's only when you look at the details that you see the limitations. No worries about using the image for purposes of example. And from what I know, the 75ARD1 will do large format with excellent results, no problem. If you really want large format, you might consider a Nikon 120/5.6 AM*ED. They are a "cousin" to the Printing-Nikkor and Macro-Nikkor families. But it does seem like you have chosen your lens, and from my experience you can't go wrong with the 75ARD1.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: But it does seem like you have chosen your lens, and from my experience you can't go wrong with the 75ARD1.
To say the least.  There is a non-zero chance that I will be leaving the Canon camp with my next camera, and the Rodenstock has the additional advantage of being camera-independent. Rumor has it that Sony is soon to pull the trigger on an A900 successor, and the A850 has been pulled from production, indicating the new camera may slot more in that direction....if they can add Live View, solve the high-ISO noise and give me a few more fps, I may have to go that direction.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
313 Posts |
I went to the ikea web sight it states the light's are not avaiable on the web (price was $9.99)no Ikea around me any ideas? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
I found an old thread called "Guess the light source" where member Learjet used a flashlight to reflect off the ceiling for his light source, and it gave a very even and hotspot-free illumination. What is happening there is the reflection off the ceiling is making the source look "infinite" in size, like it's coming from everywhere, similar to natural light in a room with no direct sunlight. I decided to try to mimic the effect with the Jansjo LED lights and large reflectors. I believe the key ingredient to make this ultra-diffuse technique work is eliminating any direct illumination, so I put a horizontal reflector above the lens and shined the LEDs onto the reflector. Here's what it looks like:  Here's the same 57-D cent using this technique  For reference, here's the 57-D using a 12-source ringlight  And here's the 57-D using "Ray's Super Diffusion" (RSD) setup 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
That's a tremendous result, noticeably better than the ring light. I can't tell from the perspective of the "setup" image, but you'd eliminate the last potential vestige of reflected light if the bulbs are completely above the lower plane of the lens hood, and if the inside of the hood were matte black. The contrast is already staggering, though - I don't know if I'm physically capable of seeing an improvement, even if my suggestions cause one.  Certainly a great technique recommendation for lustrous copper. Now, enlighten me....define "Ray's Super Diffusion" please? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Quote: SuperDave Now, enlighten me....define "Ray's Super Diffusion" please? I 2nd that motion. How'd you put that reflector together? The hood lens? You know I suffer from "lackapatience" Thanks...
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I've learned more about coin photography in this one thread than I have in the past 4 years combined, and I don't mind saying so.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2424 Posts |
could you take a few more pictures with that setup using some nice silver? some circulated vs, UNC? I am very curious as to see how it captures cartwheel luster
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
In theory, the setup with ultra-diffuse lighting should capture zero luster since it simulates an infinite-sized source. Luster requires a point or line light source. The smaller the source, the higher the contrast and the brighter and more vivid the luster. I took photos of a medium-lustrous 1935 Mercury dime to illustrate this. First photo is with the ultra-diffuse lighting, ie 2 LED bulbs reflecting off a horizontal white reflector above the lens. Second photo is with the same 2 LEDs, but with no diffusion at all and shining directly toward the coin at 10:00 and 2:00. Third photo is with the RSD setup, essentially the same two LEDs with a combination of direct and diffuse lighting. And fourth photo is the 12-source ringlight. Ultra-Diffuse Lighting  2 LED lights  2 LED lights with diffusers ("RSD")  12-point Ring Light 
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
Quote: Certainly a great technique recommendation for lustrous copper. Now, enlighten me....define "Ray's Super Diffusion" please? The RSD setup is the end result of countless hours spent trying to perfect my lighting. It starts with the basic Jansjo LED lights, and then I add a combination of reflectors and diffusers to concentrate the light into a horizontal, diffused slit a few mm wide and about 1-1/2 inches long. I also add a vertical black paper absorber in front of the assembly so that no light goes up into the lens. This allows me to put the setup under the lens without causing flare, and thus lets me get the light right up to the edge of the coin. Works best for raw coins, since being that close for slabs causes unwanted reflections. If you guys are interested, I'll take a couple pics. I'm thinking about building a better one soon, as this one is essentially a "tape and scraps" looking contraption, but it works well. Quote: I 2nd that motion. How'd you put that reflector together? The hood lens? You know I suffer from "lackapatience" Thanks... The reflector is just a couple of pieces of notepad paper. I cut a half-circle the diameter of the bellows from one edge, then taped them together at the front. I folded the front lip at a 90-deg angle to stiffen it so it would not sag so much.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
The "new" diffuser is wonderful for Details grading, and I suspect it'd be pretty interesting with a cameo Proof. RSD is still just a bit too diffuse to be a subjectively-premium "look at my coin" image, yet the LED lights fall slightly short of enough contrast for proper grading, behind the RSD setup. Man, this has me thinking. Hate to say it (I'm no real fan of diffusion) but I like the first image the best. Try that on an old worn Brown copper coin, if you have one - I think you'll like the result. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
Yep, that's why I thought it worthwhile posting. The technique as pictured gives little to no luster, but is good at showing the coin surfaces and color. One thing I didn't mention about the technique is that I think you can play a lot of games with it. Bring the lights closer to the reflectors and the source looks "smaller" and starts to produce some luster. Add a small piece of aluminum foil at a strategic point and even more luster will appear. The presentation I showed is the most diffuse the setup can produce, other than if you used a larger piece of paper and moved the lights lower so they looked even bigger...
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Aw, now you got me thinking about aluminum foil....you're going to be the death of me, man. Now, how can I get aluminum foil stretched drum-tight....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4038 Posts |
Aluminum foil is fairly easy to work with, though I admit I have been working with a thick version of it that I got via military surplus and it's quite nice stuff, but still not thick enough to work on its own. My recommendation is to lay the foil on a flat and smooth surface, rough side down (aluminum foils have a shiny side and a rough side) and put a piece of smooth printer paper (photo paper works well...) on top of it, then burnish the foil with finger pressure until all the wrinkles are gone. Then turn the foil and paper over so the foil is shiny side down, apply a tacky glue to the rough surface, then apply another piece of photo paper or thin cardboard stock while again lightly burnishing it to make sure all the wrinkles and voids are worked out before the glue dries. Now you have a stable piece of reflector material to work with.
I have had good luck with two of these, trimmed to 3x5 card size, one at 6:00 and one at 12:00, separated by the LED light spacing, LED's at 3:00 and 9:00, with the foil pieces held about 1 to 1-1/2 inches above the coin surface. Gives a relatively even illumination but with a lot of direct incident light from the LEDs to emphasize luster. Maybe I'll put that setup back together and see how it performs with that '35 Merc.
|
| |
Replies: 140 / Views: 49,936 |