The article was published in the CN Journal Vol. 56 No.8 October 2011, page 498.
Here is a link to the article.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9...GLsIG5QF1WbwHaxby hadn't published on the web a complete number set at the time I wrote the article, just groupings. The article references the 7 reverses I found associated with this obverse at the time. Here is the conversion chart for those to the current Haxby reverse numbers.
Rev.1 - I7
Rev.2 - I7a
Rev.3 - J3
Rev.4 - K2
Rev.5 - K2a
Rev.6 - K2b - This is the reverse that was counterfeited for 1858 and 1859.
Rev.7 - J3d or J4
Notes on identifying the K2b counterfeit 1859 reverse:
The Chinese Counterfeit
Will never be a higher grade than seen in photo in the article.
Will not have Vicky crud in the devices.
Will not have 170 years of patina.
Will have a colour that will make you pause.
The coin will look to be softly struck.
Vicky has had a nose job.
The Real coinWill be seen across many grades.
Will have Vicky crud if a circ. unless the coin has been cleaned.
Will have a nice patina unless the coin has been cleaned.
Will be chocolate brown unless the coin has been cleaned.
The coin will look to be fully struck.
Vicky has her original nose.
Notes on identifying the K2B 1858 counterfeit reverse:
The Chinese CounterfeitWill never be a higher grade than seen in photo in the article.
Will not have Vicky crud in the devices.
Will not have 170 years of patina.
Will have a colour that will make you pause.
The coin will look to be softly struck.
Vicky has had a nose job, resulting in a bump at the bridge of her nose.
The obverse is exactly the same as that use for 1859.
The reverse has exactly the same die cracks as that found for 1859.
The entire date has been re-cut into the working die using the wrong font.
The T in CENT is missing the upper left side.
The Real coinThere is no real coin for 1858 with any of these characteristics.