Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,986 |
|
Valued Member
Australia
129 Posts |
In my opinion pre-decimal coins are not really my strong sport. They're not as easily collectable as decimal coins, and the lowest decimal mintages pale in comparison to pre-decimal mintages - for example, the 1985 fifty cent piece is the lowest of its denomination minted at 1,000,000. Compare that to the 1923 halfpenny, which has a mintage of 15,000! So I'm a little confused as to why coin dealers like M.R. Roberts list "uncirculated" pre-decimal coins to sale, where judging by the photos, they're clearly not most of the time? Please refer to the following link if you're confused: https://wynyardcoins.com.au/collect...ecimal-coins
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21673 Posts |
The numismatic term applies the the condition of a coin, not if it actually circulated or not. By numismatic reasoning, uncirculated condition coins have seen very little, or no circulation at all.
Uncirculated condition pre decimal coins exist for almost every date 1910-1964. All are very rare for their condition, and thus command huge prices at public auction.
I have yet to actually witness a pre decimal 1923 Halfpenny in better than gVF condition, even after more than 50 years of collecting. It seems that almost (if not) all of them, have seen extensive circulation.
'Uncirculated' coins as released for sale by the RAM and sold through MR Roberts coin dealer, are packaged by the Mint, and were sold in their original Mint packaging, so it follows that these coins have seen no circulation at all.
I will leave it to the OP's judgement to decide if coins pictured by MR Roberts are good enough to be graded accurately enough to be purchased by the OP, but I have been dealing with them for almost all of my numismatic life, and I am 100% satisfied with their reputation.
For myself, throughout the entire of my numismatic life, I have always carefully examined each coin in hand personally, before deciding to buy, irrespective of whatever the reputation of the seller may be
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1333 Posts |
Yeah people are a bit looser with pennies and half pennies grading, that is in general. However I don't think MR Roberts is over grading so to inflate their prices. Plus Australian's pennies and halves, often aren't struck well.
|
Valued Member
Australia
368 Posts |
A lot of collectors are of the mistaken view that every Uncirculated coin should be perfect. This is definitely not the case. Especially with pre-decimal coins when the standards of production were nowhere near what they are today. Marks,scratches,dents,die fill can all seem like a coin is circulated when it isn't. You only have to open a few hundred RAM rolls of decimal coins to realise that it is quite normal to find coins that you would swear had been circulated. The same applies to pre-decimal coins as most weren't rolled at the mint but came in bags, with greater potential for coins to clash together. The sheldon system of grading deals a bit with the quality of Uncirculated coins. Years of experience and knowledge are required to tell the difference and usually(not always) dealers who have been around a long time have this expertise. Judging a coin's condition from photos with high end coins is a bit dodgy as well.
|
Moderator
 Australia
16470 Posts |
There is a logical non sequitur in the OP. The post starts off talking about mintages, then switches to talking about grading and condition.
The grade of a coin should have nothing to do with how rare it is.
Pre-decimal coins can be found in genuinely Unc condition, though it is much harder than for decimals. That's because predecimal coins were never sold in uncirculated sets. Back then, the mints did roll coins, so it was possible to obtain "mint rolls".
Grading standards have fallen considerably since predecimal coins were in circulation. Grab a copy of the classic volume "Collecting Australian Coins" by Tom Hanley. Written at the height of the coin collecting craze just after decimal coins came out, it explains that when you get a mint roll of coins, only one-third of them will be in Uncirculated condition.
Think about that. Two-thirds of coins that came direct from the Mint, untouched by human hands, did not qualify as Uncirculated by that grading standard, even though they literally never circulated. That's because back then, bag marks counted as "circulation damage", and coins usually received bag marks within the mint from the production process (getting dumped into hoppers, etc).
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
Firstly one has to know the highest relief points for predecimal coins on the reverse +obverse for GV-GVI and QE2..halfpenny,penny,three pence,sixpence,shilling,florin and crown. If you don't know then your paying a UNC price for an AU...
|
Valued Member
 Australia
129 Posts |
Quote: There is a logical non sequitur in the OP. The post starts off talking about mintages, then switches to talking about grading and condition.
The grade of a coin should have nothing to do with how rare it is. I got a little carried away when writing that post. Thanks for pointing that out.
Edited by OzCollection 03/29/2023 01:20 am
|
Valued Member
Australia
75 Posts |
I looked at most of the pennies. The grading looks pretty good to me. Quote: I have yet to actually witness a pre decimal 1923 Halfpenny in better than gVF condition, even after more than 50 years of collecting. It seems that almost (if not) all of them, have seen extensive circulation. I have been fortunate enough to view one that would grade as MS64 BN. Certainly 1923 halfpennies better than gVF are few and far between.
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
2405 Posts |
Quote: I have been fortunate enough to view one that would grade as MS64 BN. Certainly 1923 halfpennies better than gVF are few and far between I agree 100% My 1923 halfpenny grades right between catastrophic and road-kill, but it fills the hole.
The Ox moves slowly, but the Earth is patient.
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1020 Posts |
Quote: I agree 100% My 1923 halfpenny grades right between catastrophic and road-kill, but it fills the hole. Yes,I've never been able to jag/afford anything other than VG. There are some Unc./Aunc in private collections that rarely appear on the open market. As an aside its an interesting Coin that,like the 1930 penny,did not have any official Mint records. Also like the 1930 penny the first Sydney based 'finds' appeared during the 1940's.Collectors/Dealers/Numismistists ID them whilst searching for 1930 pennies at that time. Probably earlier finds but hard to find verifiable facts. https://coinworks.com.au/1923-Halfpenny~15446
Edited by Basil 04/02/2023 8:18 pm
|
Valued Member
Australia
368 Posts |
Quote: Back then, the mints did roll coins, so it was possible to obtain "mint rolls". . I'm always about learning and knowledge, so please can you point me in the right direction to verify this. I've always been under the impression that the mints in oz did not roll pre-decimal coins. The banks did the rolling. I have never seen or heard of a roll with a name of the melbourne mint or Perth Mint on it, or any reference. I have never seen any up for sale in any auction either. If I'm wrong then I have learned something new. How can I get reliable info on this subject?.
|
Moderator
 Australia
16470 Posts |
I stand corrected; I think technically it was the Commonwealth Bank (then later the Reserve Bank after the Reserve Bank was founded in 1960) that rolled coins from the Mint, and as such, you couldn't guarantee that every coin in a "mint roll" was directly from the Mint. As I understand it, the coins came to the Reserve Bank in drums, and the Reserve Bank then rolled them up, but there may be coins from circulation tossed into the mix at some point. You can also get Commonwealth Bank and Reserve Bank rolls that are entirely non-Unc, coins that were re-wrapped from circulation. You can still technically call them "mint rolls" if they are all indeed Unc coins from the Mint, but you'd have to bust the roll open to prove it. Here's somebody on ebay selling 1958 sixpences from a Commonwealth Bank "mint roll": https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/262751740955
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
Valued Member
 Australia
129 Posts |
What happened to the RAM mint rolls? Did they get discontinued in the 90s? I remember seeing a coin magazine with the title "The Death of the RAM Roll"...
|
Moderator
 Australia
16470 Posts |
The RAM used to make its own rolls, for distributing through the bank system; from 1966 through to the late 1980s, you could get both Reserve Bank rolls, and RAM rolls (at this stage, the RBA rolls were generally re-circulated coinage with virtually no mint coins present - coin guides published at the time warned people not to confuse the two roll types). I think the logic behind the RAM doing its own rolls was to save on double-handling. As for the reason for their discontinuing, I can't recall if it was the operating and maintenance costs of the rolling machine, or that the Mint needed the space for something else. Banks at the time were also switching away from rolls, to plastic bags, greatly reducing the demand for rolled coins.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
852 Posts |
Hi Sap, did the coins in the pre decimal era go to the Reserve Bank in drums? The RBA was only founded in 1960 and the Commonwealth Bank was the outfit handling the coins until then. Plus my understanding is that boxes were used for many years (such as 1200 pennies to a box at the time the 1930 was minted). Perhaps drums came in towards the end or perhaps only after decimals? Plus the early years had coins shipped from London in barrels. And then there were the coins shipped from India and the US. The US shipped the coins in rolls.
|
|
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,986 |
|