| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,204 |
|
|
New Member
United States
29 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7616 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree, beat-up EF-40 Below average eye appeal.
Edited by Coinfrog 04/22/2023 8:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1510 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5663 Posts |
I'd say VF-35. Hard to say if the surfaces are original or if there is too much light in the photo.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19131 Posts |
I'm okay with a weak XF40.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Very close to XF sharpness, but surface preservation drops it to VF35 for me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18649 Posts |
not sure about the surface originality due to lighting and shadowing. I'm also at XF40. the 94(O) are known for weak strikes. some of what we are seeing is strike related. not sure 100% that it would grade straight without better photos. all of your shots are at an angle which doesn't help
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36684 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
29 Posts |
Here are the pictures of the original listing if it helps.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2365 Posts |
Your photos definitely show her damage and not what you might have been expecting, from the sellers photos. I'm in consensus with the XF40. There might be a VAM on her someplace but, inspecting for those gives me a headache.
|
|
New Member
 United States
29 Posts |
Hmm, now that you mention that it might have a VAM, Ive noticed that the mint mark does look kind of skewed. It looks like it could be a VAM-1A but it would be too circulated to tell if it has those die polish lines in LIBERTY. Any help?  
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,204 |
|