| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,088 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19113 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1044 Posts |
Nice! Yeah that privy is definitely bigger than the one on the V75 ASE. Glad they finally got it right |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1217 Posts |
Ah heck, I should have scoped the V75 also. Sounds like we have rain coming and I worked my tail off today, maybe I can do that one of the next few days. Getting the jitters about the laser privy release already. This Wednesday is when my wife and I do grocery shopping. I told her we HAVE to be back before 11am (release time in the central time zone), 1045 would be better!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12811 Posts |
Thanks for the close-ups! it sure looks like that eagle has a drumstick or chicken wing with a bite out of it in its left set of talons.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10478 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts |
Side by Side Privy Mark Comparison:  Note the difference in the lettering spacing and thickness. The Army Anniversary treatment of the motto practically reads "WETRUST" instead of "WE TRUST". (See Gilly's note below) Quote:
Thanks for the close-ups! it sure looks like that eagle has a drumstick or chicken wing with a bite out of it in its left set of talons. CK: Under a 10X stand magnifier the "details" of the oak leaves in the dexter talon are better in comparison to the arrows found in the sinister. . .you're right! Those arrows look like a chicken drumstick with a bite taken out. These laser engraved CNC creations are really inferior products, in my view. " Even a clock that's stopped is right twice a day. "
Edited by cptbilly
08/16/2025 10:54 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5602 Posts |
While the WW2 privy mark is Smaller than the Army Privy mark, They are Both Tiny, Very difficult to See , Thanks Capt, Much appreciated.....  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5602 Posts |
Sweet Picture of The Ladies....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
Quote:
Note the difference in the lettering spacing and thickness. The Army Anniversary treatment of the motto practically reads "WETRUST" instead of "WE TRUST". But that doesn't have anything to do with the Army Privy coin on its own, it's a result of the type 2 obverse refresh.  Quote:
These laser engraved CNC creations are really inferior products, in my view. We'll to be fair, now you're taking about how fine they can make the details on the privy, which to me was ambitious and I think the results are pretty darn good. I'm still curious where the mint is at on creating the master dies on this release? The Laser Beam privy is suppose to be the first release using laser to create the master die? This privy shows excellent, not perfect, detail. In the future will the mint be able to do the anti counterfeit surfacing like the RCM does? It'll be interesting to see if the detail is even better on the Navy and Marine Corp privy marks. To me it doesn't seem like the Laser privy is all that detailed, but possibly in person it will have some unusual surfacing. Really looking forward to seeing it in person and how the rest of the details will be different with the laser engraving. Edited by Gilly
08/16/2025 09:58 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
Quote:
They are Both Tiny, Very difficult to See Isn't that supposed to be the case with a privy mark though? At some point, doesn't it stop being a privy mark and start being a design change? They are supposed to be small. If you need a magnifying glass to see a mint mark, you probably need one to pick up any detail of what a privy mark is supposed to be. Every coin shop from the smallest store front to the largest online superstore sells magnifying glasses and loupes for a reason. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts |
Gilly, thank you for pointing out the obverse change from four years ago via those comparison photos.
" Even a clock that's stopped is right twice a day. "
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12811 Posts |
Quote:
But that doesn't have anything to do with the Army Privy coin on its own, it's a result of the type 2 obverse refresh. Why did IGWT need to be made yet more bold? IMO it should be on the rim if anywhere. Again, one person's opinion. Edited by CelticKnot
08/16/2025 12:32 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5602 Posts |
My Point, The " Mint Artistic Infusion Program ", Or Whatever the proper nomenclature is, Since the Introduction of That program, Fine details are Simply Not as Defined, Simply Erased, Actually If one looks close enough, The Fine details are Not present in the Shown pictures, Check out the Breast on the 2020 Example, Then the 2025, See the 2020 has a band around same, The 2025 does Not have it at All.. Clearly from a collector's point of view, We pay more and Receive Less than the Mint Artistic Infusion Program brought us . We get Much bigger " Designer's Initials ", Same Silver content, Less design Character, Along with the Privy mark Era that's upon us, Not to mention the added " logo " is While larger than the 75th Anniversary Ending WW2 Privy mark, It is Tiny or Hard on the Eyes, Also We pay approx 3X's + Over spot.  How about going back to the Originally designed American Silver Eagle Bullion Program's Hand Crafted Dies, I for One Would enjoy that. Technology owes itself to performing " Better " than prior attempts, I see the series designs as getting less classic artwork and Less My Vote. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5602 Posts |
Celtic's on to My Point!!!!!!  I like the way You think My Fellow Coin Collecting Enthusiast.  PS, The Type 2 Obverse Refresh was a First at the result We Now have.  Edited by Morgans Dad
08/16/2025 12:54 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
Well this one will probably be a long one, will see how it ends up. Quote:
The " Mint Artistic Infusion Program ", Or Whatever the proper nomenclature is, Since the Introduction of That program, Fine details are Simply Not as Defined, Simply Erased, Actually If one looks close enough, The Fine details are Not present in the Shown pictures, Check out the Breast on the 2020 Example, Then the 2025, See the 2020 has a band around same, The 2025 does Not have it at All.. I'll just lead with the obvious. You seem to be comparing the obverse of the type 1 with the type 2 again. Just realize the type 2 design is not the exact same design. I'd have to study the detail you are taking about, it seems like what I think they can the tunic. This is not part of the AIP. Even if it was responsible, it would still be because the mint wanted the design to more closely reflect what Weinman originally designed. Here is wiki info on the AIP. It has nothing, zero, to do with the designs not been as sharp as they once were, it's only the selection process and also nothing to do with silver eagles: Quote:The Artistic Infusion Program (AIP) is a program of the United States Mint, established in 2003, which invites American artists to create designs for U.S. coins and medals, most notably the 50 State, DC and US Territories, and America the Beautiful Quarters. The goal of the AIP is to enrich and diversify the design of United States coins and medals by contracting a collection of artists with varying artistic skills and talents.[1] The program was created after some entries in the 50 State Quarters series were described as being of poor quality, with a Mint spokesperson saying the AIP would ensure "excellence in design".[2] Coin designs edit Lincoln Union Shield cent, reverse only 50 State Quarters, reverse only District of Columbia and United States Territories quarters, reverse only Native American dollars, reverse only American Innovation Dollars, both obverse and reverse American Platinum Eagle, proof reverse only Most Modern United States commemorative coins I think one factor may have been the change to CNC machine created master dies for producing the coins. Works ok with circulating coinage, not so much on collectible or even bullion coinage where you expect a certain quality level. Before CNC it seems like the mint was using a reducing machine. Those, to me also looks better than CNC. Edited by Gilly
08/16/2025 7:46 pm
|
| |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,088 |
Posted 08/15/2025 9:36 pm
