| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,135 |
|
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19184 Posts |
Unfortunately, I'm not seeing any photos on my end.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
No images yet.  to the CCF!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189017 Posts |
Images fixed and topic was moved to the appropriate forum for the proper attention. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
looks like machine doubling/tripling, nice photos btw
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 . Who told you that? Looks like MD=machine doubling and DDD=die deterioration doubling to me. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7049 Posts |
Yep John1 nailed it...worn die = DDD and MD
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
Yep, some machine tripling. It is called Machine Doubling but I thought machine tripling is more appropriate for this coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Not tripling, just multi directional contact marks by machine after the strike. One strike a double hit with the loose dies giving the final insult.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
549 Posts |
Is this a proof dime? It sure looks good for a 2012 based on the first picture. Still learning here.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Not a proof coin. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The fields on this dime is very fresh because of a strong die polishing on the fields. (Possible Feeder Finger Damage) The areas near the rims are showing that is is in the early LDS. Thus the look on the micro images of die wear on the areas near the rims. As mentioned Machine Doubling is visible on the devices. The mintmark tells it is a Philadelphia coin. Most proof coins are from San Francisco. (but not all since 1968)
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,135 |
|