| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 733 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
69 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34397 Posts |
@roll, yes that looks like struck through gritty grease to me. As to whether or not a similar piece has been posted on CCF previously, you could use the search box in the upper left hand corner of your screen.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7508 Posts |
It is a nice struck thru. I have seen a few similar examples on ebay. Definitely a keeper 2x2 worthy.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Nice. 2x2 worthy for sure. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10034 Posts |
I was wondering if this could have been some pre-strike damage (separation) to the planchet b/c the area involved looks like it "passes behind" the figure of the man. But zooming on the closeup shows the same mottled appearance on the man's left leg. So it could not have happened before the strike.
So I am going with the flow...greaser.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95018 Posts |
Quote: I was wondering if this could have been some pre-strike damage (separation) to the planchet b/c the area involved looks like it "passes behind" the figure of the man. the marks that come in on an angle 'behind' the flag bearer are Feeder Finger Damage. That area of the die is the high point of a die and can get scratched from the feeder fingers without getting into the recessed area of the design (device).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
579 Posts |
 Yep. More grease than on John Travolta's Head in the movie "Grease."
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I'm thinking this is Feeder Finger Damage that altered that die. Note how alters the devices. It looks like an issue that ever reached the incuse devices on that area, wiping them out on the first couple of devices. The angle looks correct for this. Unless this is not raised. If incuse on the coin, then it might just be debris stuck on your coin. (and still could be related to Feeder Finger Damage?) Just need to see more images at different angles to see what is really going on? Raised or incuse on the affect areas?
Edited by coop 02/13/2022 1:07 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
I wonder if there was a lump of grease on the feeder finger that transfered onto the coin. It would account for why the angle of what looks struck through lines up with the Feeder Finger Damage.
Edited by Wrekkdd 02/13/2022 1:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5887 Posts |
Very nice! Certainly a strong example.
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95018 Posts |
yep, thanks for agreeing with me, Coop
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7005 Posts |
I was under the impression that the coins reverse is now (then) used as the hammer die. Where Feeder Finger Damage would be on the obverse....  Are there any Mint records which answers this?
Edited by Greasy Fingers 02/14/2022 12:24 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
69 Posts |
Thanks so much folks, I can't believe I just found another one in the first 12 rolls of a box I just got. Will post shortly. Thanks again.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts |
This is a "field-restricted struck-through error" which in this case isn't exactly confined to the field. The feeder/ejector smeared a gritty paste across the die face, possibly scarring the die itself in the process.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I found a cent once that had something similar on it on the 2009 LP2 reverse:  Kind of figured out it was a grease issue. The affected areas were incuse with grease on other areas as well.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 733 |
|