| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 2,282 |
|
Valued Member
United States
343 Posts |
Hey all, just looking for some opinions on this one. Thanks!   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
878 Posts |
I'll take a SWAG at MS63+.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
343 Posts |
Thanks for the opinion! I'm a little concerned about the bagmarks on the cheek and the chatter below the PL of Pluribus, so every set of eyes helps. Thanks again!
Edited by UnimpossibIe
03/09/2025 11:51 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5663 Posts |
Beautiful reverse, but the deep bag marks on the cheek might hold it to a 62. Hopefully not, because it's a beautiful, frosty coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
MS-62, breast feathers well struck up.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2333 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7617 Posts |
The obverse has PL surfaces that just amplifies every tick and blemish the obverse has. The reverse is outstanding. I think it would make 63 in the grading room. Nice coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
I wouldn't pay 63 money for this one. MS62.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1510 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3323 Posts |
Agree with @smat 's VAM-4 designation, which won't bring any real variety premium. This coin looks MS62 to me. If it proves to be PL, it's a 300-400-dollar coin. If it makes DMPL, double that.
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
|
|
Valued Member
United States
343 Posts |
Thank you all for your opinions as well as for the VAM citation. I checked all of the Top 50/100/etc. VAMs and when it didn't match any of those I just gave up. I was also torn between MS62 and MS63, I wouldn't be surprised or disappointed with either. I don't know if the Reverse is PL enough to warrant that designation, but I will keep my fingers crossed. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3632 Posts |
A couple years ago, I think this coin could have pulled a 63 from any of the TPGs. The much tighter standards being used right now likely holds this coin to MS-62 in their eyes. The reverse is fantastic. The overall eye appeal is better than the technical grade. The fact that we are all on the 62/63 bubble suggests that it's still a bourse floor MS-63, but I'd hold off getting it certified right now. Nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I'm at 63 too. The reverse is 65 easily and the obverse is a 62 imo.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2003 Posts |
My first impression was that the bag marks hold it to a 62 but it does indeed appear to be proof-like. Can you hold the coin on edge over a printed page and see the reflection of the printing? If so, for what distance, (2",3",4", etc...)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73900 Posts |
I'll say MS-63.
Errers and Varietys.
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,282 |
Posted 03/09/2025 11:49 pm
